|
Raw
foods?
Some
people believe that to get the most nutrients
from foods, especially fruits and vegetables,
that uncooked is better than cooked - but
think again. There is no scientific justification
for the promotion and consumption of raw
food diets. Cooking serves several useful
purposes: it kills harmful bacteria; it
makes food softer to chew; it
improves the digestion of foods;
it breaks down nutrients like proteins and
improves their digestion; some nutrients
are lost during cooking, but others (especially
antioxidants) become more available to your
body - for example more antioxidants are
abosorbed into the blood stream from cooked
carrots/ corn/ tomatoes/leafy greens than
from their uncooked versions; cooking makes
some nutrients (e.g proteins common in beans,
seeds, sprouts) non-toxic. Apart from some
vitamin losses, there is no other proven
detriment of cooking food (as long as it
is not charred/burnt in the process) and
there are several benefits. It is also a
myth that we need to eat raw food in order
to obtain beneficial 'enzymes'. Most enzymes
consumed are inactivated by acid in our
stomach and enzymes in our intestine. Verdict:
eat a variety of foods, in a variety of
forms.
Last
Updated: March 2004.
|